MIMIC (Morphed Integrated Microwave Imagery at CIMSS)


Frequently Asked Questions

  1. There's a patch on the image that seems to pulse on an hourly basis. Is this a real phenomenon?
  2. The track of the MIMIC center doesn't exactly match the official record of the storm track. Which is right?
  3. A dark red patch (or streak) suddenly appeared on the image, and it seems to repeatedly flash every hour, moving with the storm. Is this real?
  4. Does MIMIC account for parallax?


There's a patch on the image that seems to pulse on an hourly basis. Is this a real phenomenon?

It is probably an artifact of the morphing algorithm. The algorithm blends in a new "base image" every hour, and if there is a long time gap between actual microwave data, then the animation will repeat small-scale advection in the same feature until the next update occurs, creating a "pulsing" artifact.

Back to Top

The track of the MIMIC center doesn't exactly match the official record of the storm track. Which is right?

The MIMIC morphing algorithm needs to define a center of rotation for the resulting animation, and so the algorithm's center moves directly between microwave-defined center locations. This path will veer slightly from the official storm track record (from NHC and JTWC), for several reasons. First, midlevel eye shown in the microwave imagery is sometimes offset from the surface-level storm center described by the official record. Second, the temporal resolutions of the two sources (1-12 hours for MIMIC and 6-12 hours for the official track) are different, so a position on one track has to be compared against the interpolated version of the other track. Third, every track (MIMIC, NHC, JTWC, etc.) is affected by navigation error, either in microwave imagery or geostationary satellite imagery, and they affect each track differently.

Back to Top

A dark red patch (or streak) suddenly appeared on the image, and it seems to repeatedly flash every hour, moving with the storm. Is this real?

It is not real. As we say in the disclaimer on the main page, the individual images that are used as input into this product sometimes contain bad data in the form of missing scanlines or anamalously high or low values that often stretch in an arc across the image. When these areas are incorporated into the MIMIC product they form artifacts that fade in and out, and appear to move with the storm center. However, they have no physical meaning and hopefully they will not obstruct your interpretation of the imagery.
Back to Top

Does MIMIC account for parallax?

MIMIC and MIMIC-IR have a simple parallax correction algorithm. The position of the microwave imagery is shifted on the assumption that the observed structures are uniformly 10 km high. This creates an overcorrection for low-lying features, particularly coastlines, but minimizes the position error on the eyewall, which is the most important feature. 

Back to Top


Tony Wimmers and Chris Velden
Tropical Cyclone Research Team
Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies (CIMSS)
University of Wisconsin - Madison

Revised: October 20, 2005